NY Divorce Consultants Fighting the corrupt New York Divorce Industry!

26Dec/110

Poor Divorce, Rich Divorce – Social Inequities

If there is any doubt that the New York Divorce Industry rips off tax payers the doubt should be settled when looking at the dual-track contested divorce system for rich and poor. The Divorce Industry has set up the perfect system where poor New Yorkers who can't pay their fees are denied access to the Supreme Court System and sent to tax payer funded agencies. In the meantime, those who have assets to pilfer, the targets of the Divorce Industry, are stuck in the corrupt Supreme Court System of New York.

The Supreme Court System of New York supports the Divorce Industry by doling out lucrative and poorly supervised court-ordered services with outrageous costs that litigants are forced to pay. The Supreme Court System acts as the employment agency for the Divorce Industry and those who can't afford the fees of the Industry suffer tremendously. Meanwhile, the tax payers of New York are left to pick up the tab in local Police services, Family Court and Child Protective Services for poor families who can't afford access to the Supreme Court.

The source of these inequities stem from the New York Constitution. The Family Court has the same powers as the Supreme Court so long as the Supreme Court doesn't want to deal with a case as shown in the NY Constitution. This sets up the fraud because one system is primarily at the tax payers expense, Family Court, and the other is at both the tax payer and the litigants expense, the Supreme Court. Here's the quote from the constitution:

13.c. The family court shall also have jurisdiction to determine, with the same powers possessed by the supreme court, the following matters when referred to the family court from the supreme court: habeas corpus proceedings for the determination of the custody of minors; and in actions and proceedings for marital separation, divorce, annulment of marriage and dissolution of marriage, applications to fix temporary or permanent support and custody, or applications to enforce judgments and orders of support and of custody, or applications to modify judgments and orders of support and of custody which may be granted only upon the showing to the family court that there has been a subsequent change of circumstances and that modification is required.

If a divorcing couple can't come to an amicable agreement and doesn't have $20,000 in combined attorney retainer fees they can't access the Supreme Court System. If they go it alone as pro se they will face certain failure in an insiders game bereft of supervision of day-to-day operations, devoid of due process and free of outside monitoring by the US or NY State authorities. There are no free legal services to navigate Supreme Court so the only option is to wait until a bad situation gets so bad that you go to family court. Even if there were free legal services for access to the Supreme Court lawyers are only part of the Divorce Industry and there is no free access to custody or financial evaluators in Supreme Court. So with no way to gain access to the Supreme Court couples must duke it out with the Police, Child Protective Services, Family Court and some litigant paid services.

Why are the elected Judges of the Supreme Court serving as employment agents for the Divorce Industry? Why do tax payers pay for court rooms and staff to house the Supreme Court when it is helping a private industry bill out over a billion in fees a year? Shouldn't the industry be paying for some of the costs of the system since the Divorce Industry players are the primary beneficiaries of the current system? Why are tax payers the sole funders of the attorney and judicial discipline for the Supreme Court? NY is the last state besides CT that doesn't make bar associations pay some portion of attorney discipline, why are the tax payers footing the bill for this billion dollar industry? Why do pro se lose so much in Supreme Court without the protections of due process? Why are the poor forced to over-taxed and under-funded agencies while the State of New York will foot the bill for days of senseless trials in Supreme Court that defy common sense and only benefit the Divorce Industry? With so many court funding problems why is NY giving so much to the Divorce Industry and in the meantime harming countless families and innocent children with gross violations of civil rights?

Perhaps the biggest question is why do we all say that's just the way it is?

Its time for a change but the first step is serious scrutiny of this unconstitutional system. Where is Preet Bharara? NY Can't get the job done cleaning up this Industry, we need outsiders to fix this mess.

5Nov/110

The Friedlander Tragedy MUST be a Catalyst for NY Divorce Reform

As horrific as the Friedlander deaths were it is equally horrific that New York State is not reviewing the circumstances that led an ordinary man to such extraordinary actions. This family was suffering through the worst of the divorce industry. One of the attorneys is known as one of the biggest fee mongers in Westchester and no doubt they were under incredible financial duress from ridiculous bills. Broken New York laws kept the couple battling over the house long after custody was settled and no doubt such punishing bills made it impossible to move out. Surely the passive legal guardians that do nothing but bill were long since done with the children and with no social workers involved on the case there was no one to catch warning signs. Undoubtedly their case dragged on for over a year as the Judge ordered crazy bills and had no sense of urgency in his dealings, pushing the billing mill for his lawyer friends. Surely the parents were feuding stuck in the same house and both the lawyers and the court system did nothing to calm the situation but send more bills, adjourn more court dates and delay decisions.

We need a NY State or Federal commission to examine the circumstances that put the kids on such a dangerous situation. We need a 'Friedlander Law' that forces judges to make expedient rulings in contested divorces. The law needs to assign state funded social workers to contested cases and they need to have regular evaluations of the stress in a divorce. The law needs to limit divorce lawyer billing beyond 20% of net worth so piggish divorce lawyers can't show up to a house closing to take all the proceeds from a families sole asset. We need to abolish the practice of courts serving as employment agencies for divorce lawyers as unqualified legal guardians. NY forces families to pay 250 per hour or more for law guardians that are wholly unqualified to deal with the psychological issues of children in divorce. Lawyers have no training to deal with emotional issues in divorce yet in the backwards NY Divorce laws they are to be the emotional voice of children in divorce. The end result is tragedies as terrible as Friedlander and many more that aren't as horrid.

These children should not die in vain and NY state can't look the other way on the sorry state of the divorce industry.

It's time for change!

20Oct/110

NY Divorce Courts Operate in the Stone Age of the Legal Industry – Court Reporters

One of the limiting factors in appeal is the ridiculous cost of court transcripts in New York Divorce Courts. After the sorry excuse of a court room that is New York Supreme Court Matrimony Part where due process is randomly ignored or followed, but generally pissed on, comes the archaic Appeals Court of New York. The Appeals Court is an intimidating place where you are arguing your measly divorce issues alongside Citibank, Goldman and other mega-clients. Whether you are challenging serious legal issues or being pillaged by divorce attorneys the same requirements apply - 9 PRINTED copies of the ENTIRE case record, which is WAY more than a transcript. Simply copying the complete case record 9 times can cost thousands of dollars and rest assured, no one probably reads it in its entirety, but the burden is on the one filing the appeal to produce the monstrosity.

The first step is to get the court transcript, however, and after seeing this dinosaur system it would be laughable, if it wasn't so damaging to families. Court reporters in NY are amongst the last in the nation to do things the old fashioned way with mysterious typing boxes that then must be transcribed into readable pages. My request to the court reporter for transcripts came back with a cost of $6 per page, and there were about 500 pages to transcribe, so about $3,000. I have sent only $500 to the court reporter back in March but now in October as the appeal window has closed, I still don't have one single page of transcript nor do I have my five hundred bucks. The chick took the money and did absolutely nothing, zippo nada. She moaned that she needs more money but grudgingly agreed to do the first day of my 'trial' play acting.

Even though I have run out of time for the appeal, largely due to this idiot court reporter not responding and charging exorbitant fees, I am demanding that she deliver at least one day of the trial or send the money back. Believe it or not, after sitting on her ass and doing nothing for 7 months, SHE STILL NEEDS TWO MORE WEEKS to type about 30 pages.

I'm sure if I had an attorney ask it would've been different but this is one case where I can't wait for automation to put her out of work. There is no reason that NY families and children should be paying for antiquated courtroom procedures when virtually every state in the US has done away with these arcane beasts. Imagine losing your kids and all your assets and then being trapped in an appeal processor waiting for this old maid to get out the selectric and bang out a few pages.

Un f'ing believable but welcome to NY Divorce!

21Sep/110

A lone child faces the horrors of the NY Divorce Industry

I can't stop thinking about the incredible strength that it took a child to fight the corrupt NY Divorce Industry. This child was banned as pro se from all contact with his children except one-way phone calls with the Mother on speaker phone. Yes, a court can rule these cruel punishments against someone with no lawyer. In any case after years of this humiliating nonsense the child wanted to see her father.

The police were called multiple times to physically restrain her from seeing her father. Yes the police blindly enforce this nonsense in Westchester. Finally after being threatened to be sent to an in-patient mental institution, which btw the school was ok with, this brave child who was scared to death fought back.

With a brave lawyer detached from the insiders filth of ny divorce the child won an order of protection from her dangerous and wealthy mother and won the right to see her father. Thank god for family court and a judge who saw through the filth of supreme court but the the damage is done and there's no justice - but $500,000 on legal fees from the wealthy mother.

21Sep/110

My visit to CAMP to appeal divorce

So finally has a CAMP conference for my divorce appeal. My assertion that the divorce industry is a sleazy government backed insiders con game is only reinforced. The lawyer who lied to the Judge repeatedly and violated numerous ethical standards and constitutional law was greeted warm hearted by the friendly mediator, a retired judge. Of course the two were old buddies so I could see where this was heading from the outset.

So it didn't take long for the distinguished retired judge to remind me who he's working for as he calmly instructed me that the minimum cost of my appeal was going to be $50,000 in legal fees. This was the number he'd decided I guess. So then I ask thr distinguished judge why a lawyer who lied,broke rules of ethics and violated laws should be rewarded by me, the clear victim. Why shouldn't the court take responsibility of fair courts. He laughed.

31Aug/110

Who will fight the Divorce Industry of New York?

As I send out my analysis of the Divorce Industry and pray for someone with the funding and power to take an action I'm left wondering who that person could be. The problem is that the notion of Divorce has so many connotations religiously, legally, practically, etc. It takes a person with a lot of intelligence to see through the fact that we aren't discussing the merits of divorce or divorce laws of New York when we look at the problems of the Divorce Industry. We are looking at plain old government-backed corruption. We are looking at a system that destroys lives of people who have no civil rights protections - the middle class and children. We are looking at a network of unsupervised elected officials awash in limitless powers over citizens in their courtrooms. Besides death there aren't many other punishments that a Supreme Court Judge in Divorce can't order in a divorce court in NY without any questions at all from their supervisors or the judicial system.

The Divorce Industry is a network that has unlimited access to the assets of their customers. They have incredible court powers to order fees and punish critics and those who don't comply with the system. The rulings of the Divorce Industry can't be undone in any court in New York or Federal Court so they have incredible power. We have systems of ethical enforcement that are secretive and not under the jurisdiction of any law enforcement body in New York besides secretive Grievance Committees that answer to no one but their own insular bodies. So with huge billings, unsupervised elected officials and Grievance Committees that prosecute less than a half percent of attorneys in New York in a year we have a free for all and the losers are families of New York and innocent children whose lives are destroyed for many years or permanently after entering the system.

So who will give a crap about this? Frankly, it seems that no one really cares at all. The insular Divorce Industry is stuck debating esoteric legal issues and ignoring the big picture. The Divorce Industry reform actions are like a doctor putting a band aid on the little toe of a person who was shot in the chest. They miss the point. It's the victims, stupid. It aint about protecting an old corrupt system that tramples civil rights and destroys unwitting citizens, it's about protecting the integrity of the court system, the US Constitution and public integrity. It's about ending the license to steal that the Divorce Industry has, not about the merits of a fault system or other esoteric legal issues.

So the simple answer to me is that the person who will make a difference is the person that will control the flow of money into the Industry. This person will make litigants declare the source of legal funds prior to action and will heavily penalize those who use illegal or undeclared assets in divorce. The person will have to look at the record of pro se litigants and the Judges who ruled in pro se cases to find patterns of discrimination. The person will have to look at some specific cases and ask big questions - why was one person allowed to spend $500,000 of undeclared money on lawyers while the other had no representation and lost their kids in a trial without representation? How can we allow a State to take children from loving parents without representation? How can we have a court system devoid of due process that clogs its dockets with meritless cases by litigants who can't really afford the costs? Why is a State government ordering litigants to make terrible financial decisions that liquidate assets and ruin the future of children? Shouldn't we be protecting children and not taking an active roll in their demise?

So in short we need a big thinker who can see past the niggling details of divorce law, turn a blind eye to the insular industry and listen to victims. The person must be in the federal government or a private attorney who wants to sue New York State to demand some answers on pro se, court ordered fees relative to client assets, judicial ruling records and Supreme Court processes that are violating the civil rights of those who can't afford court access.

Who is that person? It ain't little old me, but I hope my typing helps the situation one day.

15Aug/110

Divorce – The Shame of New York

After much thought and frustration with the laws of New York Divorce I sincerely hope that my extensive paper attached to this post will be read. I have many valid suggestions for reforming the corrupt New York State Divorce Industry. We must end the culture of dishonesty and corruption that has taken root in the New York State Supreme Court and New York must start defending families, not the greedy divorce industry.

Divorce, The Shame of New York

Comments are appreciated!!

6Apr/110

Child Support Conundrum – What to do?

I'm in an interesting situation that I can see no way out of except laughing and waiting for a judge to decide one day. I was assigned a child support/maintenance number that exceeds my current income. I have an equitable distribution judgment against me that exceeds all my assets (zero) and exceeds the value of the asset that it was placed against. I have a wage garnishment for back support/maintenance that will make it impossible to pay an already impossible sum. None of the debts are dischargable in bankruptcy - no debt associated with a divorce judgement is dischargable in bankruptcy. With the garnishment I can't pay my tax arrears or much of anything else. Legal Aide of Hudson Valley laughed at me and rejected my claim for assistance.

Appeal is the only solution but the costs are staggering and impossible. How can one pay $3,000 for a transcript of a trial when they are facing serious penalties for child enforcement arrears? How can one afford a lawyer in such a case when basic living needs aren't being met?

All I can say is that a government that puts its citizens into these messes is predatory. New York State is operating a predatory divorce industry that makes billions each year and it is a bastion for corruption and civil rights violations. I pray that the Supreme Court will act wisely in Turner vs. Price and rule that the constitutional right of substantive due process does apply in civil divorce proceedings and that States that violates the civil rights of litigants in the court can be sued in Federal Court.

The only solution to ending the persecution that New York State exacts on its citizens with its predatory divorce industry is to challenge the constitutionality of the system in Federal Courts.

23Mar/111

US Supreme Court hears Turner vs. Price – Do civil rights apply in divorce?

First of all I must say that if you read my rants I have frequently pointed out that the New York State Divorce laws clearly violate civil rights. The courts force those who can't afford counsel into biased 'trials' and basically railroad the poor sucker stuck in Supreme Court of NY. There is no legal assistance available for one stuck in these crooked court rooms. There is no way out if the other side can keep paying. You can lose your kids, your money, your property and you can be imprisoned. These courts have infinite unchecked powers in NY. Appeals are impossible as pro se and if you are facing jail for other obligations, paying a lawyer for appeal doesn't really seem like a good use of money.

We were supposed to be protected from this type of government abuse by the Constitution. Well it took some guy in South Carolina, my hero, Mr. Turner in Turner vs. Price, to take his case to the US Supreme Court to answer this question. Turner was broke and he couldn't afford his support payments. He also couldn't afford a lawyer and no one would help him as he wallowed in the court system. Turner ended up getting sentenced to a year in jail for not paying. He appealed on the grounds that he was entitled to a lawyer since he was facing the loss of his liberty - Substantive Due Process. I'm not a lawyer but this smart one explains the case in legal terms.

I pray that the Supreme Court disagrees with South Carolina and sets precedent for the entire country that those of us facing the loss of our liberty and property are protected under the rights of Substantive Due Process of the 14th amendment. We are entitled to counsel when we are facing penalties that will deny us our basic freedom guaranteed in the Constitution.

6Jan/111

Albany – The Nation’s Capital for Unethical Attorneys

According to the recently released 2009 American Bar Association Survey on Lawyer Discipline Systems 29% of the nations attorney ethics violations occur in Albany, making the 3rd Judicial Department of New York (Albany area) the nations capital for unethical attorneys. Across the US in 2009 a mere 5,502 attorneys out of over 1.4 million attorneys were disciplined for ethical violations, or .39% of attorneys, yet in Albany there were 1,596 ethics violations from only 44,674 attorneys. 7% of attorneys in Albany have been disciplined for ethical violations, nearly 20 times the national average.

Besides leading the nation in unethical attorneys, New York is one of the last two States in the country to fund attorney discipline committees directly from legislative appropriated tax dollars. Across the nation, attorney behavior is governed by ethics codes created by State Bar Associations, but enforcement and funding of discipline committees vary widely from state to state. New York spent approximately $8.3 million of legislative appropriated tax dollars to oversee 191,000 lawyers in 2009 as compared to over $52 million of Bar Association assessed fees that California spent to discipline 169,000 lawyers or $11 million that New Jersey spent from Supreme Court user fees to oversee 68,000 attorneys. Unfortunately there is no correlation between the amount of money spent on attorney discipline and the effectiveness of such programs. For example, while California outspent New York by over $41 million on attorney discipline only 350 attorneys out of 161,000 (.21%) were disciplined in 2009.

While funding models for attorney discipline vary widely between states, one thing thing that is clear when looking at that national statistics is that attorney's have little to fear for unethical, non-criminal behavior in the US. With a paltry %0.39 of attorneys facing a disciplinary action across the nation clearly ethics enforcement is ineffective in the US. A fair court system is an underpinning of our democracy and clearly the US needs to step up its enforcement of the ethical behavior of attorneys. A discipline system that only punishes less than .5% of its population is not a deterrent to unethical behavior nor is it offering effective discipline of its members. Considering that many large corporations try to shed their bottom 5% performers each year and 3.1% of adults in the U.S are in the jail or parole it is inconceivable that only 0.39% of attorneys across the nation behave unethically. If there is a statistic that shows why attorney’s are so maligned in the US the fact that less than 0.5% of attorneys will face a disciplinary action in a year shows that attorneys have little to fear for unethical behavior - except in Albany, the nation's capital for unethical attorneys.